JOSE BARROSO, PRESIDENT OF THE EU COMMISSION
In this article from The Independent in 2003, the true story of how far paedophilia is controlled from inside Portugal's powerful elite is told. If those who govern the country are paedophiles out of control, that explains why the Police are doing nothing to help the Mccanns find Madeleiene, and why charges are being brought to silence the McCanns and try to make them go away.
The current head of the EU Commission, EU President Barroso was the Portuguese PM at the time and it was he that ordered an enquiry into the paedophilia that had come to light amongst Portugal's elite. However Portuguese child abuse experts say that he must have known all about the paedophilia going on before as they had told him often enough.....
From a report 'After the paedophile allegations were first published, Prime Minister Jose Manuel Durao Barroso ordered an investigation. Jorge Sampaio, the President and a Socialist Party leader, proclaimed, “The impunity which for decades on end has made this case a shame for us all will finally end ... Faced with the horror that so many children, who were entrusted to us to be educated and cared for, were victimised it is necessary to declare here that the guilty will be severely punished.”
He implored Portuguese citizens to trust the justice system saying, “We have to hope that our institutions work.”
However, a spokeswoman from Portugal’s Innocence in Danger charity said the organisation had been warning about child abuse for years in Portugal but there had been a virtual “media blackout”.
“It is no good President Sampaio and Parliament sounding off about the problem now and appearing to be knights in shining armour,” the spokeswoman continued. “They, like the police, must have known about the widespread abuse of children in Portuguese institutions for years. They have been warned often enough by charities such as ours but for reasons best known to themselves have remained silent.'
Gordon Brown Goes Quiet
I imagine that the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who offered to help the McCanns, must know that the Head of The EU Commission must be involved in covering up paedophilia. He seems not to be saying anything now the McCanns really need his help, and the Portuguese Paedophiles are really showing their strength - even able to muscle the Police into bringing nuts charges against the McCanns.
Is Brown now too joining the conspiracy of silence in EU governments about how far into government paedophilia goes, and how criminal gangs make millions from the trade in abducted children - many abducted to order by clients who have already seen their photographs?
News organisations also must know what is going on. They too seem not to have the courage to report what they must know to be the truth.
Europe's paeophiles know they are safe, with even the President of The EU Commission acting to help them in the past. With paedophile sympathisers at the very top of the EU, what chance do the McCanns have? No wonder Gordon Brown has now gone silent.
Meanwhile kids carry on getting abducted, few seen again. As for Madeleine and thousands like here, Barroso knows the truth, but does nothing.
LATEST ON PORTUGUESE POLICE COVER-UP - The official Portuguese police spokesman in the Madeleine McCann case, who resigned last weekend, has told friends he was 'unhappy' and 'exasperated' by leaks to Portuguese media by junior officers involved in the case. He also told a former colleague he was "always worried the evidence against the McCanns was weak". Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa said that the leaks were intended to push Kate and Gerry McCann into confessing they had killed their daughter. Sunday Telegraph 21.9.07.
The only question is how far up the chain of command does the cover up go.
UPDATE 11.10.2007
Portuguese Police move on paedophile rings at last. Is it too late?
From the very begining I suspected top elite paedophile involvement in Madeleine McCanns case. Thats why the police did not act as they knew there was no point. A child does not dissappear into thin air; those who took her are powerful people thats why the McCanns have been faced with such huge probelms.
Posted by: azra awan | September 29, 2007 at 11:05 PM
WELL, Gordon Brown should get off his fat arse and do what a prime minister is supposed to do, if Tony Blair was PM, I bet Madeleine would be found by now. SHE IS A BRITISH CITIZEN FOR GODS SAKE. Paedophiles are the SCUM of our society, GET RID OF THEM, ONCE AND FOR ALWAYS.
Posted by: audrey | October 15, 2007 at 12:56 PM
While i am not in the least surprized by the news of high profile politicians in another country being involved in paedophilia, i would like to to say to every one, particularly the person who claims that id Tony Blair was still in charge the little girl would have been found by now. While i understand her her sentiment, the truth is that we to have a major problem of paedophiles within the house of commons and the house of lords in the UK. however unpalatable this may seem ,it is the truth, whichis why you find you cannot get certain people charged with child rape, and right now we have groups who are trying to push through legislation to allow anyone to have sex with children as young as 4 years old, that idea makes me feel violently sick, as it will the nation when they find out. Our political masters are up to their necks in this, which is why you will never hear them discuss the issue during question time, nor as private members bills, to stop child abuse in this country. We have been verbally attacked for what we are doing in setting up the biggest ever public access site with details of every convicted rapist and child sexual pervert, including paedophiles and hebophiles, which will allow everyone to take steps to protect those most at risk, and their loved ones. I have challenged the prime minister to a live debate on this subject several times, but so far i have never received an answer, i can only draw conclusions that the evidence we have is true and he does not want to face the public with the fact that the elite in this country are the worst offenders when it comes to child sexual abuse of our children. As for thiose who claim we are stopping our children from exercising their right to choose when they have sex, which includes of course Mr Peter Tatchell, the well known gay rights activist, i will say this to all of them, our policy is that the age of consent should be raised to 18 in line with the age in which you can drink, vote, and now smoke. We see no logical argument against this, and the only people against us are those who want the age brought down in order that they can have sex with young children, i leave it up to you all to decide why they would want such a law in place.
Thank you all, and best wishes from all the team at GHR.
Stuart.
Posted by: Stuart carnie | November 03, 2007 at 12:05 PM
16/18 What's the difference?
The point is that babies are raped and children from baby stage upwards. Surely this is what needs preventing. By 16 consent is at least possible.
Posted by: Tapestry | November 03, 2007 at 12:21 PM
The Myth of Stranger Sexual Abuse
Society has become so fixated on stranger abductions and the myth of child abuse happening at the hands of strangers that it has entirely overlooked the unpleasant truth: the vast majority of child sexual abuse is at the hands of family members and friends. It appears that it is easier for society to find a scapegoat to blame for the abuse of children rather than to examine why children are abused in such epidemic numbers by their own families.
Yet the statistics once again entirely debunk the myth. In a July 2000 study by the NCJJ entitled Sexual Assault of Children as Reported to Law Enforcement, 34.2% of child sex offenders were family members and 58.7% were acquaintances, while only 7% of child sexual abuse was perpetrated by strangers. Amongst younger victims, the percentage of family perpetrators was even higher. In 48.6% of cases involving victims between zero and five years of age, the perpetrator was a family member, while it was 42.4% for victims between the ages of six and eleven. The percentage of perpetrators that were strangers for these age ranges was 3.1% and 4.7%, respectively.
To stop at the incidence of child sexual abuse does not even reveal the total extent of child abuse in the United States. Child Help USA compiled data from the United States Department of Health and Human Services in September 2003. It discovered that of all child abuse that occurred in 2001, only 10% was sexual abuse. The leading forms of abuse were neglect (59%), which included medical neglect, and physical abuse (19%). 81% of all abusers were the child’s parents. 59% of the abusers were females.
The weight of the evidence suggests overwhelmingly that the scourge of child abuse starts in the home. Only when society begins to ask itself the painful question of why this abuse is so prevalent and why families, which ought to be safe havens for children, are so violent towards them, will it be able to overcome this epidemic of violence. It is time for us all to stop looking for scapegoats and start looking in the mirror.
http://www.critest.com/MBSold/Where%20Does%20the%20Danger%20Really%20Lie1.htm
Posted by: AshamedToBeBritish | February 07, 2008 at 04:32 PM
well done, that's what i call A REAL BLOG!!!
let's see if you can continue with the good work, a blooging is not only write words, you have to commited with the subject, learn about it, known every detail, be in touch with the readers, i'll guess you fullfil the profile...
Jajajajaja, keep it this way, you're doing just fine!!! =D
V. Alucard
Posted by: colon cleanse | May 18, 2010 at 05:27 PM
Yet the statistics once again entirely debunk the myth. In a July 2000 study by the NCJJ entitled Sexual Assault of Children as Reported to Law Enforcement, 34.2% of child sex offenders were family members and 58.7% were acquaintances, while only 7% of child sexual abuse was perpetrated by strangers.
Posted by: Generic Viagra Online | June 21, 2010 at 07:28 AM
Success does not mean anything! But if you are successful you can always maintained a positive mind! But failure does not mean anything! As long as you keep on trying you still the other side to success
Posted by: ugg knightsbridge | August 23, 2010 at 02:30 AM
Success does not mean anything! But if you are successful you can always maintained a positive mind! But failure does not mean anything! As long as you keep on trying you still the other side to success
Posted by: ugg knightsbridge | August 23, 2010 at 02:33 AM
Love those! I enjoy following your posts on facebook and rss!
Posted by: supra shoes | October 13, 2011 at 08:31 AM