« July 2007 | Main | September 2007 »

August 30, 2007

STOP BROWN BETRAYING BRITAIN

I prefer a more generalised campaign format than has been used so far - bringing in more issues.  They are all connected, of course.

Cameron's campaign title has been widely criticised

'DON'T LET BROWN LET EU DOWN'.  Not least on iain dale.

http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2007/08/ramping-up-campaign-for-eu-treaty.html#links

How about something which would work in a street leaflet - and would appeal to Sun readers more?


STOP BROWN BETRAYING BRITAIN

* Immigration out of control
* Taxes through the roof
* Education Standards through floor
* Hospital closures
* Gangs on streets
* Soldiers ill-equipped for war
* £170 billion wasted on quangos

Enough is enough.
Brown promised you a say in Britain's future.

Back Cameron's campaign for the referendum on the EU Constitution.

August 27, 2007

Health Concerns

Pleased to see that Conservatives now lead labour on health and the economy in this morning's ICM Poll.

The health concerns are my own and I'm back on a two week hospital programme prior to travelling back to the Philippines.  I was doing so well, and it's a little disappointing to have a hiccup.  But in the Philippines, where I will be soon I can do better as it is so calm relatively to the environment here in the UK.

Blogging will inevitably become patchy again for a while...but I will try to keep my toe in, as it were.  I've had a fun time blogging this summer in the UK since the end of May, and saw my readership rise steadily for three months.  The number of profile reads clicked up by 1000 on 'the tap' (www.the-tap.blogspot.com) in 3 months, and maybe the same here although there isn't a counter.  Last year I had about 70 a month (only one blog then) - now around 500 amonth or so over the two blogs.  Hardly a big deal, but this is only a hobby!

Maybe I'll blog some Philippino politics in the next few months as well as keeping an eye on things back home.

August 25, 2007

Is Gordon Brown Stupid? Part 2.

I posted under 'Is Gordon Brown Stupid?' desribing how hackers were doing stuff to stop me posting.  This went from crashing my PC while I was writing my reply to Tory Boy's suggestion that Gordon Brown was not stupid.

Later on I had a string of X's appear as I wrote.  My writing would post itself, before my post was complete, and dialogue boxes would storm up in front of my face.  It would go on until I switched off - which I could only do by pulling the plug.  All in all quite a professional job.

Only thing who is it doing it?

One clue came up on Iain dale's blog where Chris Paul wrote a reply under 'they go because they can'.  He tracked my regular movements between the City and the small diving resort on Mindoro where I sail and socialise in the Yacht Club.  There are only about 30 foreigners in that place, so how would Chris Paul know about it unless he'd hacked into my emails and tracked the route to my writings on iain dale's diary?

If I showed his entry in Italics below to the local team down there, not one of them would doubt that either Chris Paul was hacking into my private details, or that he has been given these by a hacker, who had never actually been there.

HIS ENTRY You lot should try the Socialist Republic of Manchester where the world is a so much happier place than wherever you lot live.

But to visit Manila and Mindoro (Philipines) combination is not a bad combo. Little sea plane (3-seater) commute for 200US one way. £35 a head. Not sure I agree with the level of throw back specified though.

Manila has Makati - a bustling business centre and bar strip - and also yes quite a throw back for the rest of the streets and suburbs. But some of the resorts e.g. Puerto Galera on Mindoro have wifi broadband.

Oh and BTW Chris Paul, Philippines has two P's.  Are you sure you've been there - ever in your life?  All the resorts have broadband but usually not wifi.  You pay per minute at an internet cafe.

August 23, 2007

Mirror Tries To Penetrate Conservatives!

Daily Mirror. Question for you.

Now I might be being presumptious but I believe that you think you are, or claim to a purveyor of news.

Correct? Or are you a front for an espionage organisation, as Iain Dale is rather ludicrously alleging? Where does he get all these ideas from?

If your spies are indeed hanging around in other peoples' lavatories and places like that, have they seen a missing person anywhere? Can you help me, as I'm trying to find one?

I'm a member of the public and I'm concerned by the falling share markets around the world and all the talk about a credit crunch.

What does it all mean?

Gordon Brown is our Prime Minister yes?

Where is he?

Is he frightened by the fallout coming from this financial mess? He's not gone into hiding has he because he's caused this in any way, surely?

If you are too busy collecting dirt on Tories, let me know and I will try others to find the missing Prime Minister. Why not use my idea and make this into a big headline...GORDON'S GONE WALKIES or something. I'll expect my usual fee.

LAVATORIAL OUTBURST

The Daily Mirror is not a newspaper. It's produced for the poor to wipe their arses. It is perfectly legitimate for people who cannot afford loo paper to hate Tories. Tories don't even have to wipe their own. They hire cheap immigrant labour to do it for them.

I think the Mirror needs to infiltrate the Party, and is totally justified in investigating how the other half wipes.

This Emily should have applied to be a toilet cleaner. She'd have got in no trouble, and could have secretly videoed Tories doing their private business. Perfect material for the Editors of The Mirror to peruse on their mobiles, as they jerk off in their coffee break.

August 22, 2007

Europhile and Eurosceptics Agree

Meeting Patrick Cormack for the first time yesterday, MP South Staffs who survived a deselection vote by his Constituency committee, has altered my view of him.  He ia naturally friendly and polite - a very charming old chap.  Having imagined a rabid europhile, I was quite taken aback by his mildness of manner.  Even better, he surprised me with his attitude to the referendum on the EUSR Constitution.  He was in favour of one being held.  Even better still, he was in favour of a referendum being held about membership of the EUSR entirely.

Bill Cash was also at John Biffen's funeral, which was obviously very sad, but had moments of triumph such as Enoch Powell's St George's day speech being read, and the singing of The Internationale.  BIll was hopeful that cameron would remain loyal to the eurosceptic cause, and keep the Party voting that way on EUSR matters as it did on the 'End of Parliament Act' shortly after Cameron took over - The Regulatory Reform Bill.

He seemed less sure about William Hague, and like Richard North on EU Referendum, thinks Hague could be more convincing in his avowed stand against the Constitution.  Hague seems to get key facts wrong, and makes his clear case unnecessarily woolly.  'What could you expect,' said Bill 'from a man who has sent Christmas cards with pictures of sheep for four years in a row?'!

Is Gordon Brown Stupid?

I was writing on Politicalbetting two days ago, when my computer switched itself off.  It wouldn't restart so it went into dock for a day.  The technician swept the disk, found a couple of viruses and a spyware which knew was there (I could hear it working sometimes), but he found no reason he could see as to why it crashed. 

It is possible that it was a hacker.  I have no extra anti-hacker security devices. These are compex to operate, and would probably cause me more trouble than a competent hacker.  So I don't bother.

This is the bit I was writing as it crashed.  I copied and pasted Tory Boy's phrase

'One thing Brown isn’t, is stupid'. 

I had just keyed 'are you sure about that?' and was about to go on about his record on the economy but that second,  I was closed down. 

I can imagine a young hacker monitoring blogs, sitting with his instruction sheet.  'If anyone comes in and criticises Gordon Brown, take him out'.  If so, he did his job to the letter!

DOUBLE TROUBLE

Hackers again giving trouble on 22nd.  Try to post but various menus pop up unrequested so cannot proceed.

Earlier in day, Dizzy found my blog had linked into his in a mysterious fashion.  These characters are obviously peed off about something!!

Owen Paterson's Words At John Biffen's Funeral

Sarah has asked me to talk briefly about  how I remember John.

I first met him in the 1980s, so many of you will have known him longer than me and we are all aware of his remarkable achievements.

My first impression was how unfailingly courteous he was. Whenever we met he would ask with genuine interest “How is Rose? How are the children?” And “how are the cats?” John was very sound on cats.

His natural politeness was combined with real kindness towards other people. Added to his conscientiousness and capacity for hard work, he was a phenomenally effective local MP. I remember visiting a modest house in Whitchurch during one election campaign. Its front was heavily decorated with John Biffen posters. A friendly lady came to the door and as soon as she heard that I supported John, launched into an immensely detailed description of how he had battled away for many months to get her daughter specialist medical treatment. Like many others who never voted or who were not natural Conservatives, she was determined to vote for him.

His natural diffidence was most clearly on view during elections. In 1987, I spent three weeks driving him around. He made it quite clear on the first day of the campaign that knocking on someone’s door without warning and asking their political views was a gross impertinence. Instead we discussed the weather, the height of the cow parsley which makes it difficult to see down the lanes and that hardy

Shropshire

perennial, was it the responsibility of the County or the District/Borough Council to cut it?

His innate modesty was also reflected in his refusal to use the loudspeaker at any time as it intruded on the privacy of the electorate. He was also suspicious of technology: I had had a mobile phone fitted in my car – a frightfully exciting innovation at the time – thinking it would keep the campaign team in instant communication with the nerve centre as we hissed down the wet lanes. John flatly refused to use it unless the car was stationary.

His total lack of pomposity could be seen at social or political events. It was inconceivable that he should do anything so brash as “working a room.” Instead, John would always be seen in a corner with a glass of beer chatting to an old friend or two. Yet if anyone wanted a word, he was always available and they knew it.

His dress showed that he was one of the least vain people I have ever met.  I am told that Sarah did for a number of amazing old suits and ensured that socks were of the same colour. But he was still proud of an interesting pair of burgundy cords with a slight flair ending two inches above the ankle. These and a shapeless jersey were the clothes I remember him being most at ease in.

All this, combined with his sagacity, his impartiality on local matters and his readiness to work for the good of

North Shropshire

and the County with all parties made him immensely popular. He was the MP for 35 years, he won 9 general elections on the trot, having won the by- election of 1961. His last majority of 16,211 in 1992 was the largest ever for this seat, yet he never took

North Shropshire

for granted. Driving to the Association AGM one year, he apologised for not wanting to chat. He was polishing his speech, which he described as “the most important speech of my year.”

He was an extraordinarily fluent speaker. Armed with a few points jotted on a card, his diffidence would fall away, he would almost go into a trance, leaning backwards and slightly sideways, jigging up and down as he got into his stride, he would explain the most complex subjects in the clearest English. 

His articles were equally lucid, revealing a great intellect and a strong sense of history. He was exceptionally clever and he read widely.  Yet it was typical of John that his maiden speeches in both the Commons and the Lords were made many months after he was introduced, so that he got a feel of each place first. In both Houses, he was respected on all sides for the knowledge and the wisdom that he expressed.

His political beliefs sprang from his deep knowledge of this constituency and county. They were also strongly influenced by Enoch Powell’s Conservatism. When these robust views were not in favour, John turned down offers of advancement.

He then put his brilliant mind to the service of his country, when, as a member of Margaret Thatcher’s inner circle in the 1970s, he helped rethink and develop policies which led to 18 years of Conservative Government and the transformation of Great Britain.

He was enormously respected and liked by both friends and opponents as Leader of the House.  He handled the House with a deft touch and with his unique disarming humour. I got a glimpse of this when a meeting arranged with him in the Commons had to be cut short because the Labour Party was upset about some Government announcement.

Peter

Shore

, John’s Shadow, appeared in a state of some agitation. I slipped away, but saw how John was beginning to charm him and reassure him that the Opposition would get their say. There was complete trust between them.

The obituaries made much of the manner in which he left the Government. However, John should have the last word.  Soon after Christopher Gill was selected John arranged to meet him at the Mytton and Mermaid for a chat.  Bizarrely there was a bikers’ rally going on and surrounded by beery leather-clad bikers, he asked John the real reason for his defenestration from Margaret Thatcher’s Government. In a classic Biffen phrase, John replied with a twinkle, “I just told her on one too many occasions that her slip was showing.”

He was brave and independent-minded, never afraid to part company with the party line if he believed it to be wrong. So he also opposed the wretched Maastricht Treaty, being a staunch believer that the House of Commons should be sovereign.

He had great affection for the House of Commons, telling me once that “it only gets better and better.” He admired people like Dave Nellist, a flame haired Militant whose views were a mile from John’s but who, in a favourite expression, “used the place” by employing every Parliamentary trick to make life miserable for both the Government and Neil Kinnock.

North Shropshire

was very lucky to have John as its MP for 35 years. Radio

Shropshire

was inundated with calls last week. One of their most experienced journalists said to me “They really loved him and they were right.”

Many people owe a lot to John, none more than me. I would never have succeeded him without his help, advice and encouragement.

I would like to pay tribute to Sarah and his stepchildren Nicholas and Lucy, who all made him so happy at home. Sarah’s support contributed enormously to his success. In recent years, knowing that however good the medical expertise, the dialysis treatment could only postpone the inevitable, her unstinting care for him has been an example to us all.

I leave the final word to that little old lady in Whitchurch. “I’ll always support Mr Biffen; he’s a good man." 21st August 2007. Llanyblodwell

August 20, 2007

Cameron Dodge Puts Beeb In A Spin

Chief Secretary To The Treasury, Andy Burnham demonstrated that he was caught off-guard and had not even read the Redwood review.  This could have more significance than only his carelessness.  Labour generally were caught off guard, and the BBC in a panic launched accusations at Redwood before he'd even explained what his review had said.  There was an extraordinary tension on all the BBC programmes on Redwood's first day out.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_4670000/newsid_4679900/4679986.stm?bw=bb&mp=rm&news=1

Conservatives however were also puzzled when Redwood was launched across all media on a Sunday when as www.dizzythinks.com pointed out on his blog, CCHQ had another policy all set to launch that day, and they knew nothing about Redwood going 'over the top'.

Dizzythinks - 'It was suggested to me that the first anyone in CCHQ knew about the detail of Redwood's plans was when he was sitting on News 24 yesterday morning. Apparently, the main story for yesterday was supposed to be Damian Green's announcement on forced marriage which found itself relegated on the news agenda. The BBC were apparently going to use it as one of their main political stories for the day but then Redwood's report popped up

So It wasn't only Burnham and the BBC caught unawares.

The comment offered by commentators was that within the Conservative Party, this was poor management and lack of coordination by Cameron.

But another explanation would make more sense.  Cameron probably deliberately side-stepped CCHQ and launched without notifying them.  Why would he do that?

It seems likely that CCHQ has been a bit leaky in the last 18 months, and that Cameron felt the media were being continually tipped off by someone on the inside as to what his next moves were going to be. 

The Mirror were trying to place a new mole into CCHQ as revealed on Iain Dale's Diary two days ago.  Maybe Labour's last mole has recently been dealt with - I just wonder if it had anything to do with the curious step of removing the last Chairman Francis Maude, who departed like a lamb.

Whatever the explanation, it has been truly wonderful to see Burnham and a whole host of BBC interviewers going off like scalded cats in shock to see John Redwood appearing in their studios.  Cameron should by-pass his CCHQ more often.

August 18, 2007

How D'ya Like My Caption Contest Entry?

Guido's friday caption contest was a pic of John Redwood with two terriers perched on his shoulders -

What's your best idea?

I liked my last one -

'Meet my new pups - 'no cash' left.  'lurch' right.

I think that could be John Redwood's new political strapline, using the BBC's favourite 'it's a lurch' put-down, turning it back on Labour.

August 17, 2007

Street Level Politics Threatens Brown's Majority

The Conservative Party is doing better in the media this week.  The Cameron-kicking has paused, and Brown the new demi-God has gone off.  Where?  NO one seems to know.

Redwood's proposals on tax and economic competitiveness are making a few waves, and the first chinks in Brown's armour are beginning to become apparent.  He is no Teflon Tony, more an outright spinner without the charm.

Conservatives are readying to fight in the marginals using the Michael Ashcroft approach which has been successful in the past.  The media game of politics is very important, much as it confuses activists who get very frustrated trying to follow what it all adds up to.  They just want simple clear messages. 

Working the media requires policy feints, play and counter-play.  Ashcroft's Constituency level politics doesn't worry about all that.  He has demonstrated over and over again that well targeted spending on literature, leaflets and so on can swing elections in marginals for the Conservatives.

Another group, operating on the fringes of politics could be an important factor in the next election.  They are rolling out PCC's in 500 Constituencies for the first time, and have no media support at all.  They are 100% reliant on activists and leaflets to get their message across.  It is a message which has strong appeal to the white working class, and pulls more votes from Labour than Conservative or Lib Dem.  They could well lose Gordon Brown the next election, if they continue to make progress.  They probably won't win any seats.

See their new leaflets here.