« June 2007 | Main | August 2007 »

July 24, 2007

Cameron Loves His Bashers.

The day they stop bashing Cameron on Conservativehome.com is the day he's over. 

In right wing politics, bashing is the equivalent of imitation - the sincerest form of flattery.  It betrays interest to bash.  If there is no interest, silence is the response.

Bash away.  The more noise the better.  Democracy works because debate improves.

That's why Nulab are such a disaster.  They sit there in worshipful silence, and turn into scalded cats if anyone dares to even question the pronouncements of their Gord.

The other wonderful thing about Cam-bashing on Con Home is that it sure as hell confuses the left wingers at the BBC, and the Grauniad.  How can this ill-disciplined rabble ever expect to make any progress, they muse. 

They keep repeating in their narrative what a disaster the grammar school debate was.  That's because they haven't had even one debate in Nulab for fifteen years.  In fact the grammar school debate was a refreshing outbreak of democratic process and it resulted in a sound policy compromise.

If we go quiet and become like them, we'll fail this country like them.  Bash away.  Cameron loves it.  He's a localist, and localism needs bashers.

Which tune shall we dedicate to Cameron and the spirit of open debate tonight, Cam-bashers?

Cry Me A River? or why not Whitney – I’ll Always Love You?

Gordon's Barking

Cameron should have known that there were going to be floods. They happen like clockwork every sixty years. 1947 was the last time. Surely he realised these ones would be coming in 2007. What a useless leader of the Conservative Party. If I was an MP, I'd immediately write to the 1922 committee, and demand a leader who at least knows the long range weather forecast - especially when the meteorological office doesn't. I mean. What are politicians for?

BBC Website Headline - Tories to fight for referendum on EU Constitution. So why do they interview Nigel Farage? Is he a Tory? Cameron should call the BBC immediately, and explain that UKIP are a Brussels embezzling, drinking and whoring operation.

UKIP only just beat the Monster Raving Loony Party at Southall. Why doesn't the BBC call the MRLP for a comment on the EU Constitution to provide balance?

Or if they really want to hear something absolutely barking, they should call Gordon Brown.

July 22, 2007

Cornerstone Are Loyal To Cameron

Those who think that the Cornerstone are behind the attacks on Cameron, are wrong. The Cornerstone feel that their views on marriage and the broken society are being taken seriously by cameron at last. they would not attack Cameron at any time, and especially at the moment he has started to back their ideas.

Cameron is copping it from the USERphiles - who are furious he is standing firm against the USER Constitution. He is allowed to make eurosceptic noises, but not really put up a fight in the USER manner as perfected by hague.

See Portillo today in Sunday Times.
'Cameron's mentioned the Government's refusal to consult the people on that treaty (the USER Constitution) but his heart was not in it. He does not wish to unleash again within his own party the destructive arguments about Europe.'

Talk about a threat. These are the guys behind the threat to Cameron. John Bercow? Probably.

USER - Union of Subservient European Regions.

Source of information about Cornerstone - a Senior Member of Cornerstone.

The Weather Forecast Was Right

I've been blogging about the coming attack on Cameron from Murdoch. Now the assault flagged by Stephan Shakespeare is occurring.  2 Conservative MPs have written to the 1922 Committee.  I will try to find out some more from contacts today.

July 21, 2007

Cameron's Post Southall Strategy

Murdoch is said to be plotting to replace David Cameron with William Hague. (See below - Stepahan Shakesprare. Conservative Home)

http://www.typepad.com/t/app/weblog/post?__mode=edit_entry&id=36512630&blog_id=555190

Imagine what that does to David Cameron knowing that there is a plot to have him replaced involving his key right hand man.  No wonder he went half crazy spending all his time in Ealing Southall doing his level best to drive up his credibility within the Party.

Murdoch's displeasure with David Cameron goes back to Cameron's unwillingness to pussyfoot with EU leaders, or attend News International social functions, and rub shoulders with the corrupt.  Now that Cameron is making a determined fight to block the EU Constitution without the promised referendum being held first, Murdoch's displeasure and his requirements to please the EU, are moving him strongly against Cameron.

But it is Conservative MPs who decide who leads them, not the EU or Rupert Murdoch.  There are not enough europhiles to raise the 15% of signatures at the 1922 committee, and the eurosceptics will be unlikely to pull the rug on David Cameron while he is committed to fighting the EU Constitution.

There is another factor.  Cameron's electoral strategy is becoming unworkable.

The spread of a BNP vote around Britain is changing the electoral arithmetic sufficiently that the Conservatives no longer need 40% to win an election.  If the BNP are to land between 5-10% in all constituencies, and pull their votes predominantly from Labour, or parties other than Conservatives as they did at Sedgefield, the Conservatives could win an election with the 37% they were already achieving until recently.

With 'other' parties growing their support all the time, it is becoming nigh impossible for any party to get up to 40+% anyway.  'others' already have 16% in polls.  By 2009 this could well be 20%.  In the 1990's, when Conservative votes were 40+%, 'others' were more like 7%.

Cameron is going nuts trying to broaden the appeal of the party to Lib Dems and other sectors desperately hoping to find a way up to the 40+% level.  Maybe he should rethink now, and forget this strategy.  If he can consolidate the party at the 37% he is achieving, and he settles everyone down, allowing policies to be Conservative type policies, the work of the BNP especially, in decimating labour's vote will bring the target within range.  All he has to do now is consolidate.

Maybe while he's in Rwanda, he'll think of this and come back a different man.

BNP Puts Brakes On Brown, Helps Cameron

At Sedgefield the BNP's candidate Andrew Spence, of fuel protest fame, and previously of UKIP, won 9% of the vote.  9% is not enough to win a seat.  Nor was it not enough to change the result by pulling votes from other parties.

But if the same 9% vote was cast for the BNP in a marginal seat, and the 9% had been pulled from one party more than another, such a vote could change the result very easily.  UKIP, for example pulled 2% in the last general election, and thereby prevented around 30 seats from falling to the Conservatives, adding 25 seats to Labour, securing their majority, and presenting 5 seats to the Lib Dems.  Without UKIP's paltry 2% vote, Labour's 60 seat majority might have been eliminated. (Christopher Booker, Sunday Telegraph)

The BNP have so far stood only in their hotspots such as in Yorkshire and East London.  They have occasionally seemed close to winning a Westminster seat in Barking.  They have not so far strayed out from their 'racial fault line' heartlands.  So is the thought about whether they might be influential on the result of the next general election, only of academic interest? 

They have also elected a few councillors here and there winning up to 30% in council elections, but surely they don't have the resources to spread out any further, and go national.

BNP's STRATEGY

If reports coming from within the Party are correct, the BNP could have an effect on the next general election of the kind I am describing, as they are setting up branches in 500 Constituencies.  That would mean they will be standing in many marginals.  If they start to poll 9% across these seats, the effect of the BNP standing, could be dramatic.

They have no media support, no radio, no TV but they have foot soldiers.  BNP members are highly motivated and deliver literature to peoples' homes by wearing out shoe leather.  The story put out by the main media is that they are racist beasts who must be stopped.  This may be true, but it allows the BNP to surprise people by the common sense sounding literature they write.  Some of the facts contained in their writing might need to challenged, but as the party are blanked by the media, they can write their own narratives unopposed.  They are able to present themselves as victims of unfair media coverage.

SEDGEFIELD

The Sedgefield by-election showed the Conservatives' vote staying level, Lib Dem rising a little and only labour's vote falling.  It seems from Sedgefield as if the advance of the BNP is going to hurt Labour the most.  This is bound to start featuring in electoral calculations, and could be the key factor that stops Gordon Brown going to the polls in a hurry.  Cameron might start to feel grateful for having the pressure taken off him (for now) by the BNP.

July 20, 2007

Sedgefield Analysed

Cameron has done well in that many feared that BNP penetration outside the cities might be partly at the expense of Conservative support. It seems not.

From the BNP website referring to its 9% of the vote as 'victory' -

'This is a huge leap forward in an area where we have only recently set up local units; the mix of farming and former mining areas of Co. Durham cannot be considered our traditional kind of support base but proves convincingly that the BNP has an appeal beyond those parts of Britain suffering on the fault lines of multiculturalism.'

All Conservatives have to do is to avoid erosion by 'others', and Labour's vote will be the one to be eroded.

UKIP changed the results of maybe 30 seats in 2005 with 2% of the vote taken mostly from Conservative. If BNP start stripping away Labour support at three times that rate, it could lose Labour 100 or more seats, and let the Conservatives in.

If Cameron stands firm on national issues such as the USER referendum, on the West Lothian issue, and so on, he could see Gordon Brown's vote decimated while he hangs on to his. (Union of Subservient European Regions)

Sedgfield is the moment politics in Britain changed. Tony has given Gordon his parting gift.  Brown will not be seeking an election anytime soon.

Not one commentator noticed.

N.B. 35% of labour voters put the BNP as the Party would vote for second according to a recent poll, confirming the threat that the BNP pose to labour.

July 18, 2007

Cameron Takes On The USER - Union of Subservient European Regions

Why is Clarke speaking out pro-U.S.E.R on the BBC?

Because he's got the backing of Murdoch and the BBC. As Stephan Shakespeare suggests in his column, Murdoch is seeking Cameron's replacement with Bildeberger Hague who would be USER-compliant. (Union of Subservient European Regions).

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/columnists/2007/07/stephan-shakesp.html

The reason the media catapulted Cameron ahead of Liam Fox to win the Party leadership was not because he would put up such a contest against the USER Constitution. They thought he would be the next Blair - tradeable to sell Britain down the river.

The only people who can get rid of Ken Clarke are his Constituents in Rushcliffe. Cameron doesn't have Hague's support to ditch Clarke. If he tried, the media would move to assassinate him as they did IDS and Thatcher before him.

Cameron's demise is already being demanded by the USER. Murdoch is hoping to deliver it in favour of William Hague.

Cameron must stand firm, and somehow Conservative Constituents must wake up and kick out the USERphiles. Cameron's not being a traitor has shocked Murdoch and the USER. they thought he would roll over and agree to anything in return for good media, like Blair.

July 17, 2007

Bees Dying Off Threatens Human Food Supply

My cousins who live in New Zealand called in today at my UK farm to see my old Dad who's not too good.  They are producers of manduka honey over there and they sell it mostly in japan.  I asked them what they thought was killing the bees in the USA and in the UK.  Their reply was shocking.

British scientists developed a Brassica (cabbage) modified with the Bt gene, known to kill caterpillars and moths.

The scientists were quoted - 'In research done so far, we have found that if you feed the Bt brassicas to diamond-back moth and cabbage white caterpillars they all die within 48 hours, leaving the plant virtually undamaged.  If the caterpillars are killed before they reach maturity and breed, then resistance does not develop.'

Unfortunately the dumbos didn't imagine the obvious.  If it kills moths and caterpillars, maybe it will kill other insects.  It appears now, (although many disagree with my cousin's theory), that it is killing off the whole population of bees in the USA, which could lead on to mass starvation, if the process is not reversed.  The plant Bt Brassica is being widely grown and bees are dying across the world in their billions.

Bees are essential to the production of one third of human food directly through their role in fertilising crops.  They are also essential to the feed production of animals that make up another one third of our diet.  This most vital process to human survival is threatened by the careless modification of foods carried out by scientists thinking in only one box at a time.

This is exactly what was forecast to happen by many people.  You cannot trust governments and scientists to work responsibly.  The fiasco is being kept out of all media cross the west as the threat is so severe to the survival of the human race that no one dares to report it.  The News Channels are being asked to report the story of the collpase of the bee population, but to blame it on other causes, none of which are capable of explaining the sudden extermination that is happening.

I heard a radio programme on this in the UK recently.  There was no mention of any possible connection Genetically Modified crops.  Have the scientists done us in good and proper this time?

My cousins' view from the bee-keeping world was that honey produced from bt Brassica plants was not touched by other bees or the moths which normally guzzle the honey once bees had died or abandonned a hive.  This is most unusual as moths especially normally pile into a deserted hive for the free pickings.  The genetically modified plants clearly are highly toxic to bees and moths as well as caterpillars.  Something needs to be done urgently, if bees are to survive this toxic intervention in nature.

For a more scientific explanation of the subject, click http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/225743/

Humans Suffer From The Toxic Environment Too

Something seems to be suppressing the bees' immune systems, as they are suffering from multiple pathogens.  What is the root cause?  No one knows yet, it seems, but the media are definitely not mentioning the possibility that genetically modified crops might be a factor.  That would place governments in an embarrassing position - to question the wisdom of their interventions.  That would never do.  Once insects start to die, human should take note - not just becasue our food will disappear with bees dying off.  But we too have immune systems which are vulnerable to toxic substances and chemicals. 

For 3 million years our species has lived on this planet in mostly clean surroundings.  Only in the last 50/60 years have so many chemicals been released into our environemnt.  Each one places a toxic load on our nervous and immune systems.  Many unexplained increases in our morbidity - cancer, Parkinsons, Alzheimers could be ascribed to this fact - and falling levels of fertility.

The chemicals are entering our bodies in increasing quantities.  The way that humans excrete toxic substances -  sweating through the skin - is also much reduced compared to past times.  Many people find that regular Infra Red saunas are helping to improve their general health. 

Last year I was diagnosed as having a high level of Dichlorobenzene which was interfering with my DNA especially blocking my Oxidant processing capacity, and ruining my autonomic nervous system.  I would often sleep 12 hours after playing any sport.  My heartbeat was bad with atrial fibrillation attacks which landed me in hospital, being scooped up off the floor and resuscitated.  My stomach had a severe yeast dysbiosis as I could not digest any nutrients.  MY condition was going gradually worse, and I did not have much hope. 

I was given chelation intravenously, Ethyl Diamide Tetra Acetate to pull out metals and chemicals from my body and I was told to increase my sweating.  I went to Manila, Philippines and saunaed every day for six months in an Infra Red Sauna.  A year later and the same tests show a big reduction in the toxins in my body.  I am back playing sport.  My heart is better and my stomach is better too, especially if I eat raw garlic regularly.  Unfortunately I have fibrous growths in my hands and feet which are inhibiting some of my earlier movements.  But never mind.  My quality of life is greatly improved on what it was in the previous few years, and I hope to live a bit longer too.

While in Manila I had all the mercury taken out of my teeth and had loads of dentistry.  It took 5 months in the dentist's chair every week.  My mercury and lead levels have fallen from 25/31 to 7/8 and this makes it easier for my nervous system to recover acording to the doctors at the Breakspear Hospital, Hemel Hempstead, London.

Te funny thing about illness being caused by our toxic environment is that it is not acknowledged by the NHS in Britain.  Once you have something which your GP cannot diagnose, you are more or less discarded and told there is nothing worng with you and that you are suffering from depression.  For the millions of humans affected by toxic environments there are pathetically few doctors working in this field anywhere in the world.

Another way that toxins hurt us is that our immune systems don't recognise chemicals in our bodies.  They just know that something is wrong and they start to look around for something to attack.  The problem is that they begin to attack safe things like food, and so our bodies start to waste energy and resources fighting things like milk or wheat etc instead of the real enemies which our immune systems are not trained to deal with.  I had allergy suppressing injections for six months as I was reacting against many foods.  These helped me a lot as well.

We will no doubt be hearing more depressing news about our own health, our enviroment and collapse of vulnerable species in future.  We need to educate ourselves a whole lot more if we are to survive into the future.

Boris Is A Risk - But A Good Risk

Yes Polly - no doubt mostly correct although the charge sheet summary stretches the evidence accumulated further than it is capable of going by a wide margin. LIverpool would agree with you, however. They will never forgive Boris Johnson up there.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2127918,00.html

The key to Boris in London and in fact politics in general is the nation's current collapse of leadership. It's not simply a calculation as to what Boris will do himself. Can Boris inspire and lead, and manage others? That is the main question which needs answering. Government by directive is imposed from all sides nowadays from USER - the Union of Servile European Regions, Nulab and from bureaucracy's greatest friend, Cuddly Ken.

The absence of leadership by individual example, of inspiration, where other agents not governments have the confidence to build, create, invest is now a gaping void. Polly Toynbee, typical of a NuLab acolyte does even know that such qualities exists. What is the evidence of Boris' capability of such things? The answer is that it is strong. His management of the Spectator was inspirational to others, and his creativity is undeniable.

Yes he is also a risk for Cameron, as Toynbee rightly says but that too is evidence of leadership on Cameron's part - the willingness to take one. labour will not be defeated in safety and comfort, but only by Cameron taking calculated political risks - risk being another concept that under Nulab has slipped from the nation's vocabulary - other than as a nasty demon to be exorcised by the HSE.

Boris will be a strong contender, and Toynbee's pen if anything demonstrates more than ever why Boris Johnsons are needed to save Britain from becoming totally boring and incapable of anything other than playing it safe...and thereby losing the world leadership which we still have in so many areas. Boris and Cameron could bring calculated risk taking back into fashion, and show how taking on good risks would make us all better managers of our country's affairs.